BTC has risen more than 10% since 27 February, outperforming many traditional assets since the start of the US-Iran conflict. From Monday’s lows, BTC rallied 6% to a four-week high of $74.9k, while ETH gained 5% to $2,370, helped by improving risk sentiment around the conflict as well as continued ETF demand. Last week, US spot BTC ETFs recorded $833m of net inflows, while spot ETH ETFs saw $187m.

Historically, BTC has often performed well in the immediate aftermath of major geopolitical shocks. Looking across seven major events over the last decade, BTC delivered positive 1-month returns in five cases, often with a larger initial move than other risk assets. However, that strength has proved less durable over a 3-month horizon, with BTC holding onto gains or reversing losses in only two of seven cases.

One notable pattern is that BTC’s medium-term return profile tends to converge with software equities, as proxied by IGV. In other words, while BTC can trade like a high-beta geopolitical shock absorber in the short term, over time it has tended to behave more like a growth / software-linked risk asset.

The broader takeaway is that BTC’s recent resilience is directionally consistent with past geopolitical episodes, but history also suggests caution about extrapolating near-term strength too far. Outcomes are heavily shaped by the macro backdrop, and in the current episode that includes not only the US-Iran conflict, but also a unique energy and policy setting around the Strait of Hormuz.